Sunday
Jul172011
On Einstein and Intuition
Monsieur,
Like I mentioned to you in my last letter, I thought I would tell you about another famous Pisces thinker. A few years ago, I spent a month or two reading a couple of his books, and as usual, I wrote down a few excerpts for future reference. It’s funny really, I’ve spent most of the last five years reading books and carefully taking notes, and now while writing these letters to you, I’ve been referencing all of those notes constantly. I love when my seemingly illogical actions and intuitions end up becoming logical after all.
OK, so here he is…. Albert Einstein, the most renowned 20th century scientist, in his own words.
When I examine myself and my methods of thought, I come to the conclusion that the gift of fantasy has meant more to me than my talent for absorbing positive knowledge.
Imagination is more important than knowledge.
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction.
Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions.
Few are those who see with their own eyes and feel with their own hearts.
I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious.
Although I’m certainly not an authority on Mr. Einstein’s scientific theories, I do believe that I understand his way of thinking quite well. It seems to me that he was a fundamentally independent and creative personality who was easily bored by the assumptions that had already been accepted by his contemporaries. Essentially, he was an innovator who realized that if he followed existing rules, he would inevitably end up relearning what was already understood. His focus and his challenge was to experiment with new possiblities and to have faith in his own meandering intuitions. One of my favorite statements by him is this,
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.
Not only does this quote reference Einstein’s own intuitive or faith driven proclivity, it also suggests that anyone who clings to a purely rational way of thinking will never achieve anything great, unique, or innovative. The mediocre minds Einstein refers to are those people who think they are smart because they understand what is already accepted. Because of their lack of intuition and their lack of insight, they are not capable of formulating new hypotheses. Thus, the mediocre mind opposes what it doesn’t understand. It dismisses independence as foolishness. And, it becomes enraged when its assumptions are questioned. Tuition is secondary for Einstein; intuition primary. Here are a few more statements that further clarify his intuitive, faithful orientation.
The most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. Whoever does not know it and can no longer wonder, no longer marvel, is as good as dead, and his eyes are dimmed. It was the experience of mystery - even mixed with fear - that engendered religion. A knowledge of the existence of something we cannot penetrate, our perceptions of the profoundest reason and the most radiant beauty, which only in their most primitive forms are accessible to our minds - it is this knowledge and the emotion that constitute true religiousity; in this sense, and in this alone, I am a deeply religious man.
The divine reveals itself in the physical world.
When the solution is simple, God is answering.
Given his respect for the spiritual, it’s not surprising that Einstein didn’t value the traditional educational system either. Here are a few quotes that give us an idea of how he felt about traditional forms of education and institutional indoctrination.
It is a very grave mistake to think that the enjoyment of seeing and searching can be promoted by means of coercion and a sense of duty.
I believe, on the whole, that love is a better teacher than a sense of duty.
Because of my poor memory for words, this presented me with great difficulties that it seemed senseless for me to overcome. I preferred, therefore, to endure all sorts of punishments rather than learn to gabble by wrote.
The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education.
If we knew what we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?
I shall not become a Ph.D... The whole comedy has become a bore to me.
A few years ago, I completed a Master of Fine Arts degree, and I must say that I agree with Einstein’s suggestion that degrees are essentially comedies. Many of my professors were unable to step outside of their own limited perspectives. Although I studied with a few thoughtful teachers, most of them seemed more interested in gathering a group of followers or admirers than they were in helping their students develop a unique voice. Too much ego and silly jargon, not enough trust and faithful curiosity.
Shouldn’t teachers see themselves as resources? Shouldn’t they hope that their students disagree with them on a regular basis? And, shouldn’t they know to leave their more advanced students alone most of the time – encouraging them to find their own unique voice by their own unique methods? After all, aren’t the students who need to be prodded simply wasting everyone’s time and energy? If a student doesn’t love what he’s doing, he’ll never achieve anything of substance. And, he definately won’t continue working after finishing his academic requirements. In my mind, a student who must be prodded is simply studying the wrong thing; he has not uncovered his inborn area of interest.
If I were ever to open a school of learning, I would only have one requirement. All students must enjoy their studies. Any student who does not will be expelled. Although this might sound extreme, I think that expelling uninterested students would be helpful to all involved. A student’s expulsion may be just what he needs in order to find his rightful place in the world. His expulsion would remind him that he is not on the right track – the track that will lead to his inner fulfillment.
I might also require that grades would only be given to teachers. In fact, I might even have the students do the grading. That way, helpful, uplifting teachers would feel rewarded, and negative, critical teachers would know where to improve. Ideally, students would simply study what they like with whichever teacher they like. The interests of the students would serve as the foundation upon which their education would be built. In the words of the ancient Chinese philosopher Confusius,
Those whose paths are not the same do not consult one another.
I think that knowing with whom to consult is a powerful gift. And, I also think it is a powerful gift to be aware of when you feel at home. Perhaps our greatest challenge in life is to understand where and with whom we belong. Which teachers help us the most? Which friends seem most interested in our mental, spiritual, and physical health? Which partner is most supportive of our deepest interests and passions? Which job is both challenging and rewarding? Maybe this is what Einstein is referring to when he says,
When the solution is simple, God is answering.
Maybe we actually don’t need a bunch of reasons to do something or to be with someone? Maybe we only need to have an intuitive feeling of rightness or an inexplicable sense of belonging. I think that this is the feeling that I had when I started reading your essays Monsieur. The truth is that although I’ve studied both Philosophy and Fine Art at several different universities, I feel most at home while hunched over a book like yours – reading, writing, and pondering.
As I’m sure you are aware, intuition is truly a powerful gift. But, it is a subtle gift, and a gift that is often difficult to hear. In order to hear its whispering voice, we must be calm and undistratcted. Lately, I’ve been reading the work of a psychologist named Erich Fromm, and I’ve been discovering the many wonderful things he wrote about personal awareness. He also wrote a book about Love, but I better tell you about him in my next letter. This one feels like it needs to be finished up today.
Take care,
Brian
Ps. I can’t resist giving you one last quote by our friend Einstein.
“If I were not a physicist, I would probably be a musician,” he once said.
Like I mentioned to you in my last letter, I thought I would tell you about another famous Pisces thinker. A few years ago, I spent a month or two reading a couple of his books, and as usual, I wrote down a few excerpts for future reference. It’s funny really, I’ve spent most of the last five years reading books and carefully taking notes, and now while writing these letters to you, I’ve been referencing all of those notes constantly. I love when my seemingly illogical actions and intuitions end up becoming logical after all.
OK, so here he is…. Albert Einstein, the most renowned 20th century scientist, in his own words.
When I examine myself and my methods of thought, I come to the conclusion that the gift of fantasy has meant more to me than my talent for absorbing positive knowledge.
Imagination is more important than knowledge.
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction.
Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions.
Few are those who see with their own eyes and feel with their own hearts.
I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious.
Although I’m certainly not an authority on Mr. Einstein’s scientific theories, I do believe that I understand his way of thinking quite well. It seems to me that he was a fundamentally independent and creative personality who was easily bored by the assumptions that had already been accepted by his contemporaries. Essentially, he was an innovator who realized that if he followed existing rules, he would inevitably end up relearning what was already understood. His focus and his challenge was to experiment with new possiblities and to have faith in his own meandering intuitions. One of my favorite statements by him is this,
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.
Not only does this quote reference Einstein’s own intuitive or faith driven proclivity, it also suggests that anyone who clings to a purely rational way of thinking will never achieve anything great, unique, or innovative. The mediocre minds Einstein refers to are those people who think they are smart because they understand what is already accepted. Because of their lack of intuition and their lack of insight, they are not capable of formulating new hypotheses. Thus, the mediocre mind opposes what it doesn’t understand. It dismisses independence as foolishness. And, it becomes enraged when its assumptions are questioned. Tuition is secondary for Einstein; intuition primary. Here are a few more statements that further clarify his intuitive, faithful orientation.
The most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. Whoever does not know it and can no longer wonder, no longer marvel, is as good as dead, and his eyes are dimmed. It was the experience of mystery - even mixed with fear - that engendered religion. A knowledge of the existence of something we cannot penetrate, our perceptions of the profoundest reason and the most radiant beauty, which only in their most primitive forms are accessible to our minds - it is this knowledge and the emotion that constitute true religiousity; in this sense, and in this alone, I am a deeply religious man.
The divine reveals itself in the physical world.
When the solution is simple, God is answering.
Given his respect for the spiritual, it’s not surprising that Einstein didn’t value the traditional educational system either. Here are a few quotes that give us an idea of how he felt about traditional forms of education and institutional indoctrination.
It is a very grave mistake to think that the enjoyment of seeing and searching can be promoted by means of coercion and a sense of duty.
I believe, on the whole, that love is a better teacher than a sense of duty.
Because of my poor memory for words, this presented me with great difficulties that it seemed senseless for me to overcome. I preferred, therefore, to endure all sorts of punishments rather than learn to gabble by wrote.
The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education.
If we knew what we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?
I shall not become a Ph.D... The whole comedy has become a bore to me.
A few years ago, I completed a Master of Fine Arts degree, and I must say that I agree with Einstein’s suggestion that degrees are essentially comedies. Many of my professors were unable to step outside of their own limited perspectives. Although I studied with a few thoughtful teachers, most of them seemed more interested in gathering a group of followers or admirers than they were in helping their students develop a unique voice. Too much ego and silly jargon, not enough trust and faithful curiosity.
Shouldn’t teachers see themselves as resources? Shouldn’t they hope that their students disagree with them on a regular basis? And, shouldn’t they know to leave their more advanced students alone most of the time – encouraging them to find their own unique voice by their own unique methods? After all, aren’t the students who need to be prodded simply wasting everyone’s time and energy? If a student doesn’t love what he’s doing, he’ll never achieve anything of substance. And, he definately won’t continue working after finishing his academic requirements. In my mind, a student who must be prodded is simply studying the wrong thing; he has not uncovered his inborn area of interest.
If I were ever to open a school of learning, I would only have one requirement. All students must enjoy their studies. Any student who does not will be expelled. Although this might sound extreme, I think that expelling uninterested students would be helpful to all involved. A student’s expulsion may be just what he needs in order to find his rightful place in the world. His expulsion would remind him that he is not on the right track – the track that will lead to his inner fulfillment.
I might also require that grades would only be given to teachers. In fact, I might even have the students do the grading. That way, helpful, uplifting teachers would feel rewarded, and negative, critical teachers would know where to improve. Ideally, students would simply study what they like with whichever teacher they like. The interests of the students would serve as the foundation upon which their education would be built. In the words of the ancient Chinese philosopher Confusius,
Those whose paths are not the same do not consult one another.
I think that knowing with whom to consult is a powerful gift. And, I also think it is a powerful gift to be aware of when you feel at home. Perhaps our greatest challenge in life is to understand where and with whom we belong. Which teachers help us the most? Which friends seem most interested in our mental, spiritual, and physical health? Which partner is most supportive of our deepest interests and passions? Which job is both challenging and rewarding? Maybe this is what Einstein is referring to when he says,
When the solution is simple, God is answering.
Maybe we actually don’t need a bunch of reasons to do something or to be with someone? Maybe we only need to have an intuitive feeling of rightness or an inexplicable sense of belonging. I think that this is the feeling that I had when I started reading your essays Monsieur. The truth is that although I’ve studied both Philosophy and Fine Art at several different universities, I feel most at home while hunched over a book like yours – reading, writing, and pondering.
As I’m sure you are aware, intuition is truly a powerful gift. But, it is a subtle gift, and a gift that is often difficult to hear. In order to hear its whispering voice, we must be calm and undistratcted. Lately, I’ve been reading the work of a psychologist named Erich Fromm, and I’ve been discovering the many wonderful things he wrote about personal awareness. He also wrote a book about Love, but I better tell you about him in my next letter. This one feels like it needs to be finished up today.
Take care,
Brian
Ps. I can’t resist giving you one last quote by our friend Einstein.
“If I were not a physicist, I would probably be a musician,” he once said.